Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
omv7:utilities_maint_backup [2024/04/22 04:05] – crashtest | omv7:utilities_maint_backup [2024/08/05 21:04] (current) – [The Benefits of Maintaining Operating System Backup] crashtest | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 238: | Line 238: | ||
While individual shared folders can be replicated using Services, Rsync, a more efficient approach is using an Rsync Command line, in a scheduled job, under System, Scheduled Jobs to mirror a drive. This method allows for replicating the file and folder contents of an entire data drive, to an external drive or a second internal drive of adequate size. | While individual shared folders can be replicated using Services, Rsync, a more efficient approach is using an Rsync Command line, in a scheduled job, under System, Scheduled Jobs to mirror a drive. This method allows for replicating the file and folder contents of an entire data drive, to an external drive or a second internal drive of adequate size. | ||
- | * To implement something similar to the following example; it’s necessary to add and mount a destination drive, in accordance with the section labeled A Basic Data Drive. | + | * To implement something similar to the following example; it’s necessary to add and mount a destination drive, in accordance with the New User Guide section labeled |
* When formatted, the hard drives used in this example were labeled to indicate their function. This is a good practice that will help new users to easily identify drives and avoid admin mistakes. | * When formatted, the hard drives used in this example were labeled to indicate their function. This is a good practice that will help new users to easily identify drives and avoid admin mistakes. | ||
* Dissimilar sized drives can be used, provided that the destination drive is large enough to hold the source drive’s data. | * Dissimilar sized drives can be used, provided that the destination drive is large enough to hold the source drive’s data. | ||
Line 262: | Line 262: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | < | + | < |
\\ | \\ | ||
{{ :: | {{ :: | ||
Line 268: | Line 268: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | < | + | < |
\\ | \\ | ||
{{ :: | {{ :: | ||
Line 280: | Line 280: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | To organize the construction of the Rsync command line, users should consider using a text editor like Windows Note Pad. Copy the source drive on the left and the destination on the right. | + | To organize the construction of the Rsync command line, users should consider using a text editor like Windows Note Pad. Copy the source drive on the left and the destination on the right. |
The following is an example of a completed command line that will copy the entire contents of the source drive (**/ | The following is an example of a completed command line that will copy the entire contents of the source drive (**/ | ||
Line 526: | Line 526: | ||
**The practical issues of maintaining boot drive clones – when to update and rotate?**\\ | **The practical issues of maintaining boot drive clones – when to update and rotate?**\\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | 1. Linux Operating System package and security updates are unlikely to have a direct impact on the operation of the server. | + | 1. Linux Operating System package and security updates are unlikely to have a direct impact on the operation of the server. |
\\ | \\ | ||
2. Add-on packages that are direct installed on the boot drive, Dockers (Plex, Urbackup, Pi-Hole, etc.), are another matter. | 2. Add-on packages that are direct installed on the boot drive, Dockers (Plex, Urbackup, Pi-Hole, etc.), are another matter. | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | 3. If a network share is added, deleted, or any aspect of the NAS is reconfigured that changes the operation of the NAS, the backup would need to be updated. Otherwise, | + | 3. If a network share is added, deleted, or any aspect of the NAS is reconfigured that changes the operation of the NAS, the backup would need to be updated. Otherwise, |
\\ | \\ | ||
4. If a cloning mistake is made (let’s respect Murphy’s Law), a 3rd clone could become a “fallback of last resort”. Given that Linux package upgrades and openmediavault sub-version upgrades have little to no effect on network shares or the high level configuration of the NAS, a 3rd clone can be maintained that is updated //only// when the NAS configuration is changed.\\ | 4. If a cloning mistake is made (let’s respect Murphy’s Law), a 3rd clone could become a “fallback of last resort”. Given that Linux package upgrades and openmediavault sub-version upgrades have little to no effect on network shares or the high level configuration of the NAS, a 3rd clone can be maintained that is updated //only// when the NAS configuration is changed.\\ |